A Statement from the LFT on the Recent Changes to the District’s Re-entry Plan

To the Members of the Lakeland Federation of Teachers and the Larger Lakeland Community:

Like many of you, I was dismayed to see the response to the district’s decision to delay in-person instruction until October 13. The responses on social media were immediate and unlike anything I have seen in my 26-year career in Lakeland.  I will not give them more life by repeating them, but they were ugly and a direct assault on the integrity of the teachers in this district.  

I would like to believe that these comments were born from an incredibly frustrating situation and not a reflection of reality – for this has been incredibly difficult. The leadership of the Lakeland Federation of Teachers has been telling the district since the beginning of July that we were going to face a staffing crisis and that we would not be able to hire our way out of it. The hybrid model requires 100% of staff to be present every day to safely supervise and instruct students.  We have not started any of the last several years fully staffed, and it was wishful thinking to believe we would this year.  

Yes, there were medical leaves, but it is important to know that teachers do get sick and some get very sick, and we often show up for work regardless. Allow me to personalize this for a moment.  On June 8, 2019, I suffered a massive heart attack while on a bike ride.  My friend’s quick thinking saved my life. I returned to work a week later because it was important to me for my students to see me standing tall in front of them before they graduated. My doctor didn’t like it, but he let me go. Now my doctor says I am in the highest risk category for Covid-related complications and I should not be in a school.  Am I going to take a leave? Yes. Does this mean I should retire, resign, or be brought up on 3020-a charges? Absolutely not. My illness and others like mine were known. Though they did not know all the specifics, the district knew we would have to hire leaves.  

Yes, there will be childcare leaves. This also contributes to our staffing crisis, but it was also known. These are not leaves for preschool-aged children; there is capacity in the community for that. These are leaves for teachers who, like so many parents, have school-aged children and communities have no capacity to meet the need. There is no surplus capacity in any community for a teacher looking for a space to care for a second-grader. If you are a teacher with a second grader and your home district just moved to a remote or a hybrid model, your decision, in many cases, is to teach or care for my child.  I would hope we could agree that caring for your child is every parent’s primary purpose.  

The issue is not that there needed to be leaves – everyone looking at the situation knew this.  Rather, the issue is the administration waited until the last minute to recognize that we could not hire enough staff for these leaves; this was also known and communicated early in the process. We are in the middle of an acute teacher shortage. Though the problems were known, this crisis was the result of when the decision was made to act. The community could have been told at multiple points that there were still significant hurdles to cross and we would only open in-person instruction when we could guarantee sufficient staffing.

The Lakeland Federation of Teachers has always sought to work with the administration to ensure that we provide for the needs of students and staff. These issues are not unique to Lakeland, and as I write this, another of our neighbors has announced the decision to move to a remote start. Some districts have been able to alleviate the leave issue by granting telework options or creating fully remote cohorts of teachers and students, both of which we encouraged here. The Lakeland Federation of Teachers is currently engaged with the district to try and solve the childcare issue by expanding capacity in our community. 

As always, the Lakeland Federation of Teachers remains committed to our students, their families, and the community. We strive to provide the best and safest possible education for our students.  

In Unity,

Michael Lillis
President, Lakeland Federation of Teachers


A Statement from the LFT on the Recent Changes to the District’s Re-entry Plan

An Open Letter to the School Communities in Westchester and Putnam Counties

Common COVID-19 symptoms in kids include fever, cough, red throat


An Open Letter to the School Communities in Westchester and Putnam Counties from the Leadership of Teacher and Staff Unions

We feel compelled to write to you in a shared voice, as there are universal elements to our concerns about re-entry into the schools this September.  It is important to note that this is a discussion about re-entry, not re-opening.  The education of children has always been our top concern.  One truth that cannot be ignored as a necessary precursor to any successful model of instruction is a safe learning space.  Though we will open this September for instruction, the only question is the modality of that instruction.

All districts in New York were required to create a re-entry plan that addressed three options: full virtual, hybrid, and full in-person instruction.  The hybrid model is the most popular one for re-entry this September, but it poses significant risks.  The hybrid model requirement gained traction in the state early on, but unfortunately, most of what we have recently learned about COVID-19 and children calls the safety of this model into question. These risks are not a reflection of inadequate efforts by any district or administrative team in protecting the children and staff in their schools.  Rather, they are inherent inadequacies when a system designed around instructing students is tasked with creating learning environments that will protect children and teachers during a viral pandemic.  Additionally, there has been a failure in state and federal governments to ensure that adequate testing, PPE, and HVAC filtration systems are readily available. The requirements for the district plans were provided by the Governor’s office and the State Education Department in the middle of July and they were to be completed by July 31.  The Governor even added new testing and contact tracing requirements in the first week of August.

To create truly safe re-entry plans, districts would require more time, direction, and resources. It is telling that neither the state nor federal governments have provided additional resources to help ensure a safe re-entry; districts have been on their own.

Educators approach every task with a “can do” attitude.  Throughout the months of July and August, teams in each district leaned in and got the job done.  The plans were made and it is truly impressive work.  The problem, however, is that they are plans to meet government requirements for safety; they are not necessarily plans to make the schools as safe as they can be.  The limits of these plans hit close to home this summer when the Greenburgh-North Castle school experienced an outbreak of COVID-19, despite meeting or exceeding all Department of Health guidelines and having a very small student population. As anyone with any experience planning school events can attest, even the best plans on paper never match what happens once actual students are brought in.  Every plan assumes a well-behaved student body that will follow all directives and maintain masks and social distancing, even during hall passing.  Plans assume we will be able to hire enough leave replacements, substitutes, and monitors to supervise students in the next three weeks.  This will not occur.  When schools reopen with the potential of being understaffed, it will make an already unsafe situation even worse.

In every survey conducted about re-entry, the most important condition people require is that the schools be safe.  The phrase “Maslow before Bloom” is never more applicable than the current situation.  It is irrational to expect students will be able to learn in any reasonable manner when their teachers and administrators are constantly conveying the need for vigilance in mask- wearing and social distancing.  The constant need for vigilance cannot help but be internalized as fear and anxiety.  At best, schools will be more similar to a well-meaning prison than an actual rich learning environment where thoughts can be shared and joy can be expressed.

Before we can return to schools, we must be sure that every reasonable precaution has been met in order for schools to be safe.  The goal cannot be to just mitigate risk, but to create the safest possible learning environment.  Many of these requirements go well beyond the capability of an individual school district and require action at the state or federal level.  We may feel powerless to secure what is necessary; that, however, does not change the reality of its necessity.

To ensure that in-person instruction begins safely, every school district should be putting into place the following measures that create the highest health and safety standards for our students, teachers, and staff:

1.  All building-wide HVAC systems must be upgraded to a minimum of MERV-13 filtration, and if existing systems cannot be upgraded, portable units with HEPA filtration must be available for all indoor spaces.
2. There must be uniform standards for COVID testing that help monitor asymptomatic spread. COVID testing must provide accurate and reliable results within 24 hours in order to monitor asymptomatic spread. The current wait time can be as high as 12 days, which is not adequate to help prevent the spread of COVID by asymptomatic individuals infected with COVID in our schools.
3. Supply lines for PPE must be prioritized to deliver all necessary PPE to schools in a timely fashion. All schools must have an adequate supply of PPE at all times, including enhanced PPE for students and employees who require it.
4. School districts must be able to guarantee that there is sufficient staff to supervise students and provide instruction, even as individual staff members are absent for illness or quarantine, child-care, or personal leaves.
5. There must be a 100% virtual option for teachers and students who are medically compromised.
6. Plans should require a minimum 14-day shutdown once closed for COVID-19 issues.

Last year was the most challenging instructional year any teacher experienced.  There is no teacher who looks forward to beginning the year using remote instruction. Everything about teaching virtually is more complicated.  For educators, their classroom is their space.  It is where they conjure children’s dreams and give them the tools to fulfill them. Computers are sterile imposters that rob the experience of the richness of our relationships with our students.  Educators and students need to not only feel safe but must actually be safe in their working and learning environments.  Districts and governments need to strive to meet these expectations.  There is too much at stake to fall short of the safest possible model.

Additional Resources

Hybrid Model Risks:

Testing: https://covidstates.net/COVID19%20CONSORTIUM%20REPORT%208%20TEST%20JULY%202020.pdf

New Information on Children and COVID-19:




Co-signing Presidents

Marcia Heffler, Dobbs Ferry United Teachers
Edward Caperna, USWOM
Michael Lillis, Lakeland Federation of Teachers
Nate Morgan, Hastings Teachers Association
Vanessa Vaccaro, Ossining Teachers Association
Tom McMahon, Mahopac Teachers’ Association
Jennifer Maldonado, Hendrick Hudson Education Association
Elisa Rosen, Hendrick Hudson Education Association
David Wixted, Scarsdale Teachers Association
Anthony Nicodemo, Greenburgh North Castle United Teachers
Mary Claire Breslin, New Rochelle Federation of United School Employees
Samantha Rosado-Ciriello, Yonkers Federation of Teachers
Brenda O’Shea, Somers Faculty Association
Andrea McCue, Haldane Faculty Association
James Groven, Irvington Faculty Association
Judith A. Kelly, Teachers’ Association of the Tarrytowns
Chris Tyler, Harrison Association of Teachers
Jeanne Whelan, Tuckahoe Teachers’ Association
Roseanna Cutietta, Hawthorne Cedar Knolls Federation of Teachers
Rick Tivnan, Brewster Teachers’ Association
Carene Domato, Mt. Vernon Federation of Teachers
Melissa Barreto, BOCES Teachers’ Association
Jeff Yonkers,  NYSUT ED 16 Director
Sean Kennedy,  Yorktown Congress of Teachers
Lisa Jackson,  Carmel Teachers’ Association
Janet Knight,  Mamaroneck Teachers’ Association
José Fernandez, Peekskill Faculty Association
Amy Geiger,  Katonah-Lewisboro District Teachers’ Association
Kathleen Fox, Edgemont Teachers’ Association
Miriam Longobardi,  Chappaqua Congress of Teachers
Jennifer Cole, Greenburgh Eleven Federation of Teachers
Jim Nolan, Mount Pleasant Cottage School Teachers Association
Kara McCormick-Lyons, White Plains Teachers’ Association
Alyson Tina, Ardsley Congress of Teachers
Ryan Odell, Putnam Valley Federation of Teachers
Catherine Armisto, United Staff Association (PNW BOCES)
Vincent Kennedy, Katonah-Lewisboro Support Staff Association
Jennifer Moore, Croton Teachers’ Association
Melinda Merkel, Rye Neck Teachers’ Association
Jim Agnello, Bronxville Teachers’ Association
Kevin Budzynski,  Elmsford Teachers Association
Clare Delongchamp, Eastchester Teachers’ Association
Vanessa Van Deusen, Graham School Federation of Teachers
Virginia Campbell, Mount Pleasant Teachers Association
Michael Groarke, Bedford Teachers’ Association
Sparrow Tobin, Board of Directors NYSUT ED14
Laura Beck, Orange-Ulster BOCES Teachers Association
Ray Hodges, Monroe-Woodbury Teachers Association
Theresa Uhelsky, Minisink Valley Teachers Association
Chris White, Middletown Teachers Association
Jon Wedvik, Clarkstown Teachers Association




An Open Letter to the School Communities in Westchester and Putnam Counties